by nature boy » Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:18 pm
no, you misunderstand, i know that quality headphones are just that, quality. however, my point is that there is a difference from where the sound is coming from. if you're listening to a downloaded 128mps mp3, it'll still make a difference from the earbuds you get on an ipod and a $100 pair of headphones. but the source itself isn't good enough to make a huge difference between a $100 pair over a $1000 pair. anything is better than the stock ipod earbuds (however i never tried the new earpods or whatever they're called), but i'm just saying that depending on source, $1000 would be wasted when you can just use a $100 pair that would make the 128mps mp3 sound just as good.
it's like the whole beats by dre debate. everyone thinks they're bomb because they're $200+, but you can get the same kind of sound reproduction from a sub $100 pair.
if you were listening to a cd off a quality player, or even good vinyl, or maybe an extremely high bitrate mp3 (lossless), then i'd say a $1k pair would be worth it. but i don't know what you're using, which is why i asked. even every ipod would be different as their sound processors are different from generation to generation and model to model.
and yes, i have listened to really good earphones. i've had numerous dj friends, music major friends and pseudo producer friends that were all about music and quality of sound (i.e. not casual listening) and they all hate ipods (actually, they all hated mp3's until recently). heck, even my brother-in-law has a home studio for cutting tracks.