by nature boy » Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:44 pm
i think i was a bit rash in my previous replies, and i apologize for that. i wasn't bashing you, dunc, but mostly the burnaby parent's voice or whatever. i know you're not for bullying, so many of those comments i made are directed more towards what that group stands for and what they are inadvertantly saying that they believe in. i think they're extremely close-minded and for them to push that close-mindedness on something that is as innocent as a bunch of kids trying to raise awareness for anti-bullying IS in a form bullying and downright silly (because of what they claim to stand for).
for them, it's not about lady gaga. it's about being gay. watch the video.
as for role models, why do you choose the ones that you have? is it because of their personality, their reasons for doing what they do or for what they actually do? those are three very different things and i'm willing to bet for every role model out there the first two are never even in the picture. to say that lady gaga isn't a good role model is then saying that NO ONE can be a good role model (except for maybe Jesus, but he would probably be a lady gaga fan so let's scratch him from the list too) because really, everyone has a past and skeletons in the closet.
about lady gaga's drug use, do you actually know the history behind her drug use? and the fact that she (at least claims) that she no longer uses? what she does in her private life is her business, but i don't remember any song or promotion on her part that says that taking drugs is ok. i realise i could be wrong about that, but i do remember an interview with someone (howard stern maybe) where she said that she used to use when she was bullied as a kid as an escape, but she no longer uses now because she's accepted who she is and can live with it.
this is how i see it: a group of well-meaning kids made a video to display something that they believe in. they rallied a bunch of other schools (even one as far as new york) to work together on a multi-media project. using the technology and pop culture's fascination with flash mobs, i think it would make sense to use a song that is familiar and well liked and more importantly, highlights what they want to portray. i think "born this way" is a perfect choice. people like the burnaby parent's voice may disagree, and so be it, they don't have to watch it. but in trying to stop others from watching it because they think there is a possibility that others maybe could be possibly be offended by it is ridiculous. to go to the premier to ban a well-mannered video put together by school children is ridiculous. talk about bad role models? how about one that puts kids down for trying to do something good by saying that their song choice was bad? and then going so far as to trying to ban this video that probably took however many hours of planning, practice and production? really?
what i'm saying is (and again, i'm not arguing with you dunc, it's the parents voice people that i have beef with) that i cannot see how a song that advocates being happy with yourself the way you are could be offensive to anyone except for those who think being fake and/or suicide is best option for our kids.