by nature boy » Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:37 am
that can be a form of fundamentalism.
but by definition, a fundamentalist is someone who so strongly believes in a certain set of ideals or beliefs (usually religious) that anything contrary to those ideals and beliefs are pushed aside as hogwash. but those certain set of ideals or beliefs could be anything from strict conservatism (more likely) to loose liberalism (less likely but possible). it's basically the closing of one's mind to opposing ideas (or reason) to the point that you're actually finding ways of putting the other people down (like jihads on all infidels). another way of putting it would be a "holier than thou" attitude (it's close comparison, but not perfect).
i would say that many pharisees were fundamentalists, but i wouldn't say that all fundamentalists look like pharisees, nor would i say that all pharisees were fundamentals for that matter (they weren't all bad, there were a couple examples of good ones if you read the gospels closely enough).
i would say that pat robertson is a fundie mostly because of his strong conviction of that divine cause and effect that i was talking about earlier. something bad happened in haiti so they must have did something bad to deserve it. but God doesn't work that way (or at least hasn't according to years of scripture and history) but i can tell reasoning with him won't do a thing.
if you guys heard of "solid ground", i think that's a pretty good example of fundamentalism.